You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Behavioural and pathomorphological impacts of flash photography on benthic fishes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-37356-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maarten De Brauwer, Luke M. Gordon, Tanika C. Shalders, Benjamin J. Saunders, Michael Archer, Euan S. Harvey, Shaun P. Collin, Julian C. Partridge, Jennifer L. McIlwain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 19% |
| Australia | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 79% |
| Scientists | 10 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#417,507
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#4,620
of 142,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,408
of 449,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#117
of 3,288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.