You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
External ballistics of Pleistocene hand-thrown spears: experimental performance data and implications for human evolution
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-37904-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annemieke Milks, David Parker, Matt Pope |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 181 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 30 | 17% |
United States | 16 | 9% |
Japan | 14 | 8% |
Spain | 12 | 7% |
Germany | 5 | 3% |
Australia | 3 | 2% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Unknown | 86 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 136 | 75% |
Scientists | 33 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
Researcher | 16 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Professor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 24 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 632. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#35,807
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#561
of 143,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#677
of 449,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#16
of 3,370 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,370 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.