↓ Skip to main content

Relatedness and the Resource Curse: Is There a Liability of Relatedness?

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Geography, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 280)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Relatedness and the Resource Curse: Is There a Liability of Relatedness?
Published in
Economic Geography, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/00130095.2018.1544460
Authors

Rune Dahl Fitjar, Bram Timmermans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#642,438
of 12,860,000 outputs
Outputs from Economic Geography
#19
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,685
of 261,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Geography
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,860,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.