You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using stable isotope data to advance marine food web modelling
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11160-019-09552-4 |
Authors |
Stacey A. McCormack, Rowan Trebilco, Jessica Melbourne-Thomas, Julia L. Blanchard, Elizabeth A. Fulton, Andrew Constable |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 12 | 35% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
France | 2 | 6% |
Hong Kong | 2 | 6% |
Croatia | 1 | 3% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 53% |
Scientists | 16 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 42 | 25% |
Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 45 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 42 | 25% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Unknown | 55 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,885,330
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#95
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,168
of 449,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.