↓ Skip to main content

Using stable isotope data to advance marine food web modelling

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using stable isotope data to advance marine food web modelling
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11160-019-09552-4
Authors

Stacey A. McCormack, Rowan Trebilco, Jessica Melbourne-Thomas, Julia L. Blanchard, Elizabeth A. Fulton, Andrew Constable

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 25%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 45 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 30%
Environmental Science 42 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 55 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,885,330
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#95
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,168
of 449,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.