↓ Skip to main content

Deep context-aware descreening and rescreening of halftone images

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep context-aware descreening and rescreening of halftone images
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, August 2018
DOI 10.1145/3197517.3201377
Authors

Tae-Hoon Kim, Sang Il Park

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 33%
Student > Bachelor 5 28%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 72%
Unknown 5 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,467,970
of 14,574,989 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#612
of 1,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,616
of 324,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,574,989 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them