You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating Loss to Follow-Up in HIV-Infected Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy: The Effect of the Competing Risk of Death in Zambia and Switzerland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0027919 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Franziska Schöni-Affolter, Olivia Keiser, Albert Mwango, Jeffrey Stringer, Bruno Ledergerber, Lloyd Mulenga, Heiner C. Bucher, Andrew O. Westfall, Alexandra Calmy, Andrew Boulle, Namwinga Chintu, Matthias Egger, Benjamin H. Chi |
| Abstract |
Loss to follow-up (LTFU) is common in antiretroviral therapy (ART) programmes. Mortality is a competing risk (CR) for LTFU; however, it is often overlooked in cohort analyses. We examined how the CR of death affected LTFU estimates in Zambia and Switzerland. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2012.
All research outputs
#17,654,408
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,212
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,915
of 242,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,089
of 2,917 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,917 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.