You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of the rampart construction of the medieval ring-fort in Rozprza, Central Poland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-018-0753-0 |
| Authors |
Jerzy Sikora, Piotr Kittel, Marcin Frączek, Zbigniew Głąb, Alexandra Golyeva, Aldona Mueller-Bieniek, Jens Schneeweiß, Zofia Tomczyńska, Krystyna Wasylikowa, Katja Wiedner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 21% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#12,822,979
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#440
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,039
of 437,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.