You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Connecting the Dots between PubMed Abstracts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0029509 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Shahriar Hossain, Joseph Gresock, Yvette Edmonds, Richard Helm, Malcolm Potts, Naren Ramakrishnan |
| Abstract |
There are now a multitude of articles published in a diversity of journals providing information about genes, proteins, pathways, and diseases. Each article investigates subsets of a biological process, but to gain insight into the functioning of a system as a whole, we must integrate information from multiple publications. Particularly, unraveling relationships between extra-cellular inputs and downstream molecular response mechanisms requires integrating conclusions from diverse publications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 90% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#1,253,603
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#15,753
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,754
of 255,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#159
of 3,064 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,064 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.