You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Association of HNF1B Variants with Diverse Cancers: Collaborative Analysis of Data from 19 Genome-Wide Association Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0010858 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine S. Elliott, Eleftheria Zeggini, Mark I. McCarthy, Julius Gudmundsson, Patrick Sulem, Simon N. Stacey, Steinunn Thorlacius, Laufey Amundadottir, Henrik Grönberg, Jianfeng Xu, Valerie Gaborieau, Rosalind A. Eeles, David E. Neal, Jenny L. Donovan, Freddie C. Hamdy, Kenneth Muir, Shih-Jen Hwang, Margaret R. Spitz, Brent Zanke, Luis Carvajal-Carmona, Kevin M. Brown, Australian Melanoma Family Study Investigators, Nicholas K. Hayward, Stuart Macgregor, Ian P. M. Tomlinson, Mathieu Lemire, Christopher I. Amos, Joanne M. Murabito, William B. Isaacs, Douglas F. Easton, Paul Brennan, The PanScan Consortium, Rosa B. Barkardottir, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson, Thorunn Rafnar, David J. Hunter, Stephen J. Chanock, Kari Stefansson, John P. A. Ioannidis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 21% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Professor | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,069
of 194,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,959
of 96,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#355
of 686 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 686 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.