↓ Skip to main content

Impacts of feral horses in the Australian Alps and evidence‐based solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Management & Restoration, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 357)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
148 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacts of feral horses in the Australian Alps and evidence‐based solutions
Published in
Ecological Management & Restoration, January 2019
DOI 10.1111/emr.12357
Authors

Don A. Driscoll, Graeme L. Worboys, Hugh Allan, Sam C. Banks, Nicholas J. Beeton, Rebecca C. Cherubin, Tim S. Doherty, C. Max Finlayson, Ken Green, Renée Hartley, Geoffrey Hope, Chris N. Johnson, Mark Lintermans, Brendan Mackey, David J. Paull, Jamie Pittock, Luciana L. Porfirio, Euan G. Ritchie, Chloe F. Sato, Ben C. Scheele, Deirdre A. Slattery, Susanna Venn, David Watson, Maggie Watson, Richard M. Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 148 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 16 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#176,043
of 22,579,714 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Management & Restoration
#2
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,062
of 376,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Management & Restoration
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,579,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.