↓ Skip to main content

Plasma phospholipid fatty acid profiles and their association with food intakes: results from a cross-sectional study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasma phospholipid fatty acid profiles and their association with food intakes: results from a cross-sectional study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2008
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26834
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitra Saadatian-Elahi, Nadia Slimani, Véronique Chajès, Mazda Jenab, Joëlle Goudable, Carine Biessy, Pietro Ferrari, Graham Byrnes, Philippe Autier, Petra HM Peeters, Marga Ocké, Bas Bueno de Mesquita, Ingegerd Johansson, Göran Hallmans, Jonas Manjer, Elisabet Wirfält, Carlos A González, Carmen Navarro, Carmen Martinez, Pilar Amiano, Laudina Rodriguez Suárez, Eva Ardanaz, Anne Tjønneland, Jytte Halkjaer, Kim Overvad, Marianne Uhre Jakobsen, Franco Berrino, Valeria Pala, Domenico Palli, Rosario Tumino, Paolo Vineis, Maria Santucci de Magistris, Elisabeth A Spencer, Francesca L Crowe, Sheila Bingham, Kay-Tee Khaw, Jakob Linseisen, Sabine Rohrmann, Heiner Boeing, Ute Noethlings, Karina Standahl Olsen, Guri Skeie, Eiliv Lund, Antonia Trichopoulou, Erifili Oustoglou, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Elio Riboli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 4%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 92 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Unspecified 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 28%
Unspecified 17 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Other 10 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,285,586
of 13,218,736 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#7,815
of 9,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,311
of 337,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#98
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,218,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.