You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conscientious objection to abortion, the law and its implementation in Victoria, Australia: perspectives of abortion service providers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0346-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise Anne Keogh, Lynn Gillam, Marie Bismark, Kathleen McNamee, Amy Webster, Christine Bayly, Danielle Newton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 13 | 37% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Philippines | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2023.
All research outputs
#280,342
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#8
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,130
of 449,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.