You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006471.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zena EH Moore, Declan Patton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 26% |
| Ireland | 6 | 9% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 28% |
| Scientists | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 520 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 519 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 9% |
| Researcher | 32 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 88 | 17% |
| Unknown | 228 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 126 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 11% |
| Unknown | 241 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#833,448
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,589
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,486
of 449,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.