You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Distance Between Mars and Venus: Measuring Global Sex Differences in Personality
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0029265 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marco Del Giudice, Tom Booth, Paul Irwing |
Abstract |
Sex differences in personality are believed to be comparatively small. However, research in this area has suffered from significant methodological limitations. We advance a set of guidelines for overcoming those limitations: (a) measure personality with a higher resolution than that afforded by the Big Five; (b) estimate sex differences on latent factors; and (c) assess global sex differences with multivariate effect sizes. We then apply these guidelines to a large, representative adult sample, and obtain what is presently the best estimate of global sex differences in personality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 261 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 46 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 17 | 7% |
Spain | 10 | 4% |
Australia | 5 | 2% |
Germany | 5 | 2% |
Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
Finland | 3 | 1% |
Canada | 3 | 1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
Other | 25 | 10% |
Unknown | 141 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 215 | 82% |
Scientists | 28 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
Germany | 4 | 1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 13 | 4% |
Unknown | 328 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 18% |
Researcher | 48 | 13% |
Student > Master | 48 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 45 | 12% |
Professor | 31 | 8% |
Other | 84 | 23% |
Unknown | 45 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 167 | 46% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 4% |
Other | 60 | 16% |
Unknown | 60 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 415. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#72,841
of 25,971,360 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,212
of 226,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260
of 252,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#13
of 3,043 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,971,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,043 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.