You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Degradome Sequencing in Plants
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 15 |
| Book title |
Plant MicroRNAs
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-9042-9_15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-9041-2, 978-1-4939-9042-9
|
| Authors |
Shih-Shun Lin, Yihua Chen, Mei-Yeh Jade Lu, Lin, Shih-Shun, Chen, Yihua, Lu, Mei-Yeh Jade |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,763,175
of 23,596,168 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,431
of 13,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,649
of 440,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#17
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,596,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.