You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Search Algorithms as a Framework for the Optimization of Drug Combinations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000249 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego Calzolari, Stefania Bruschi, Laurence Coquin, Jennifer Schofield, Jacob D. Feala, John C. Reed, Andrew D. McCulloch, Giovanni Paternostro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,601,876
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,549
of 8,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,198
of 183,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.