You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Statistical Framework for the Adaptive Management of Epidemiological Interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005807 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Merl, Leah R. Johnson, Robert B. Gramacy, Marc Mangel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Fiji | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 79 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 26% |
| Researcher | 23 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Mathematics | 10 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 11% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2016.
All research outputs
#15,357,941
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#131,050
of 194,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,031
of 113,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#437
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.