↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy based on gray-zone fractional flow reserve in stable angina patients with intermediate…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy based on gray-zone fractional flow reserve in stable angina patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis (COMFORTABLE prospective study): Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3182-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hironori Kitabata, Takashi Kubo, Yasutsugu Shiono, Kunihiro Shimamura, Yasushi Ino, Takashi Tanimoto, Yasushi Hayashi, Kenichi Komukai, Hiromichi Sougawa, Keizo Kimura, Masahiro Gohda, Toshikazu Hashizume, Masahiro Obana, Kazuisa Maeda, Junichi Yamaguchi, Takashi Akasaka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 31%