↓ Skip to main content

Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
677 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
706 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arnaud Delorme, Jason Palmer, Julie Onton, Robert Oostenveld, Scott Makeig

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 706 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
Germany 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 11 2%
Unknown 663 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 194 27%
Researcher 135 19%
Student > Master 99 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 5%
Other 99 14%
Unknown 98 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 129 18%
Neuroscience 127 18%
Psychology 118 17%
Computer Science 55 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 7%
Other 77 11%
Unknown 149 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,583,598
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,312
of 197,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,849
of 252,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,310
of 3,558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.