You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulating Micro-RNAs as Potential Blood-Based Markers for Early Stage Breast Cancer Detection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0029770 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael G. Schrauder, Reiner Strick, Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland, Pamela L. Strissel, Laura Kahmann, Christian R. Loehberg, Michael P. Lux, Sebastian M. Jud, Arndt Hartmann, Alexander Hein, Christian M. Bayer, Mayada R. Bani, Swetlana Richter, Boris R. Adamietz, Evelyn Wenkel, Claudia Rauh, Matthias W. Beckmann, Peter A. Fasching |
| Abstract |
MicroRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) are a class of small, non-coding RNA molecules with relevance as regulators of gene expression thereby affecting crucial processes in cancer development. MiRNAs offer great potential as biomarkers for cancer detection due to their remarkable stability in blood and their characteristic expression in many different diseases. We investigated whether microarray-based miRNA profiling on whole blood could discriminate between early stage breast cancer patients and healthy controls. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| New Caledonia | 1 | <1% |
| Belarus | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 17% |
| Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,562,002
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#20,034
of 199,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,325
of 245,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#215
of 3,052 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,052 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.