You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Capturing sequence diversity in metagenomes with comprehensive and scalable probe design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41587-018-0006-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hayden C. Metsky, Katherine J. Siddle, Adrianne Gladden-Young, James Qu, David K. Yang, Patrick Brehio, Andrew Goldfarb, Anne Piantadosi, Shirlee Wohl, Amber Carter, Aaron E. Lin, Kayla G. Barnes, Damien C. Tully, Bjӧrn Corleis, Scott Hennigan, Giselle Barbosa-Lima, Yasmine R. Vieira, Lauren M. Paul, Amanda L. Tan, Kimberly F. Garcia, Leda A. Parham, Ikponmwosa Odia, Philomena Eromon, Onikepe A. Folarin, Augustine Goba, Etienne Simon-Lorière, Lisa Hensley, Angel Balmaseda, Eva Harris, Douglas S. Kwon, Todd M. Allen, Jonathan A. Runstadler, Sandra Smole, Fernando A. Bozza, Thiago M. L. Souza, Sharon Isern, Scott F. Michael, Ivette Lorenzana, Lee Gehrke, Irene Bosch, Gregory Ebel, Donald S. Grant, Christian T. Happi, Daniel J. Park, Andreas Gnirke, Pardis C. Sabeti, Christian B. Matranga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Nigeria | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 50% |
| Scientists | 40 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 258 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 58 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 76 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#251,479
of 25,191,684 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#551
of 8,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,666
of 450,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#13
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,191,684 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.