↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to enhance return‐to‐work for cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to enhance return‐to‐work for cancer patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007569.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

de Boer AG, Taskila T, Tamminga SJ, Frings-Dresen MH, Feuerstein M, Verbeek JH

Abstract

Cancer survivors are 1.4 times more likely to be unemployed than healthy people. It is therefore important to provide cancer patients with programmes to support the return-to-work process.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 5%
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 28 32%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 31%
Social Sciences 12 14%
Psychology 9 10%
Computer Science 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2015.
All research outputs
#1,122,760
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,161
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,073
of 258,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.