You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006542.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter F Day, Monty Duggal, Hani Nazzal |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 23% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
Ireland | 3 | 9% |
Spain | 3 | 9% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 6% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Cuba | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 49% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 37% |
Scientists | 4 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 331 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 54 | 16% |
Unspecified | 52 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
Other | 56 | 17% |
Unknown | 97 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 37% |
Unspecified | 52 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 4% |
Psychology | 9 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
Other | 31 | 9% |
Unknown | 98 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,036,073
of 24,007,780 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,215
of 12,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,904
of 443,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,007,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.