↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006542.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter F Day, Monty Duggal, Hani Nazzal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 28%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 27 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2020.
All research outputs
#773,416
of 15,542,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,172
of 11,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,917
of 335,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,542,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.