↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006542.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter F Day, Monty Duggal, Hani Nazzal

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 331 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 16%
Unspecified 52 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Postgraduate 26 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 6%
Other 56 17%
Unknown 97 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 37%
Unspecified 52 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 31 9%
Unknown 98 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,036,073
of 24,007,780 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,215
of 12,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,904
of 443,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,007,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.