↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cancer (1965), May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
659 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group
Published in
European Journal of Cancer (1965), May 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Sardanelli, Carla Boetes, Bettina Borisch, Thomas Decker, Massimo Federico, Fiona J. Gilbert, Thomas Helbich, Sylvia H. Heywang-Köbrunner, Werner A. Kaiser, Michael J. Kerin, Robert E. Mansel, Lorenza Marotti, Laura Martincich, Louis Mauriac, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Roberto Orecchia, Pietro Panizza, Antonio Ponti, Arnie D. Purushotham, Peter Regitnig, Marco Rosselli Del Turco, Fabienne Thibault, Robin Wilson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 1%
Austria 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 353 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 66 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 13%
Student > Postgraduate 41 11%
Student > Master 37 10%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Other 89 25%
Unknown 49 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 211 58%
Engineering 25 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 67 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,607,547
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#1,745
of 4,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,933
of 350,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#33
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.