↓ Skip to main content

Rapid Generation of MicroRNA Sponges for MicroRNA Inhibition

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
14 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid Generation of MicroRNA Sponges for MicroRNA Inhibition
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joost Kluiver, Johan H. Gibcus, Chris Hettinga, Annelies Adema, Mareike K. S. Richter, Nancy Halsema, Izabella Slezak-Prochazka, Ye Ding, Bart-Jan Kroesen, Anke van den Berg

Abstract

MicroRNA (miRNA) sponges are transcripts with repeated miRNA antisense sequences that can sequester miRNAs from endogenous targets. MiRNA sponges are valuable tools for miRNA loss-of-function studies both in vitro and in vivo. We developed a fast and flexible method to generate miRNA sponges and tested their efficiency in various assays. Using a single directional ligation reaction we generated sponges with 10 or more miRNA binding sites. Luciferase and AGO2-immuno precipitation (IP) assays confirmed effective binding of the miRNAs to the sponges. Using a GFP competition assay we showed that miR-19 sponges with central mismatches in the miRNA binding sites are efficient miRNA inhibitors while sponges with perfect antisense binding sites are not. Quantification of miRNA sponge levels suggests that this is at least in part due to degradation of the perfect antisense sponge transcripts. Finally, we provide evidence that combined inhibition of miRNAs of the miR-17∼92 cluster results in a more effective growth inhibition as compared to inhibition of individual miRNAs. In conclusion, we describe and validate a method to rapidly generate miRNA sponges for miRNA loss-of-function studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 231 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 29%
Researcher 50 21%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 20 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 30 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,171,297
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#59,322
of 194,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,387
of 241,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#609
of 3,082 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,082 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.