↓ Skip to main content

Failure of Adaptive Self-Organized Criticality during Epileptic Seizure Attacks

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failure of Adaptive Self-Organized Criticality during Epileptic Seizure Attacks
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002312
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Meisel, Alexander Storch, Susanne Hallmeyer-Elgner, Ed Bullmore, Thilo Gross

Abstract

Critical dynamics are assumed to be an attractive mode for normal brain functioning as information processing and computational capabilities are found to be optimal in the critical state. Recent experimental observations of neuronal activity patterns following power-law distributions, a hallmark of systems at a critical state, have led to the hypothesis that human brain dynamics could be poised at a phase transition between ordered and disordered activity. A so far unresolved question concerns the medical significance of critical brain activity and how it relates to pathological conditions. Using data from invasive electroencephalogram recordings from humans we show that during epileptic seizure attacks neuronal activity patterns deviate from the normally observed power-law distribution characterizing critical dynamics. The comparison of these observations to results from a computational model exhibiting self-organized criticality (SOC) based on adaptive networks allows further insights into the underlying dynamics. Together these results suggest that brain dynamics deviates from criticality during seizures caused by the failure of adaptive SOC.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Canada 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 190 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 24%
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 26 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 39 18%
Physics and Astronomy 33 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 14%
Engineering 18 8%
Computer Science 14 7%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 36 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,111,558
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,871
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,724
of 249,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#9
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.