↓ Skip to main content

Beyond counts and averages: relating geodiversity to dimensions of biodiversity

Overview of attention for research output published on figshare, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Beyond counts and averages: relating geodiversity to dimensions of biodiversity
Published on
figshare, February 2019
DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.7680083
Authors

Read, Quentin, L. Zarnetske, Phoebe, Record, Sydne, Dahlin, Kyla, O. Finley, Andrew, Grady, John M., Hobi, Martina, Malone, Sparkle, Costanza, Jennifer, Wilson, Adam, M. Latimer, Andrew, Gaddis, Keith, Pau, Stephanie, Ollinger, Scott V.

Abstract

Code to accompany Read et al. manuscript on levels and dimensions of biodiversity, entitled "Beyond counts and averages: relating geodiversity to dimensions of biodiversity." Currently (06 Feb 2019) under consideration for publication in Ecology Letters. Consists of two parts:(1) Data processing pipeline. This code will allow the user to follow the entire data processing pipeline described in the manuscript. However, to maintain small file sizes, we are only providing a small subset of the data encompassing the US state of New Hampshire. In addition, we are only providing a subset of the environmental covariate layers. All data used are publicly available. (2) Model fitting. This code will allow the user to reproduce the models fit in the manuscript. For the model fitting steps, we are providing all the data used to fit the models in the manuscript, except for the true locations of the FIA plots due to confidentiality. FIA location data were provided through U.S Forest Service agreement No. 17-MU-11261919-021.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,062,842
of 12,908,018 outputs
Outputs from figshare
#8,909
of 15,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,442
of 265,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from figshare
#242
of 512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,908,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.