↓ Skip to main content

Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) versus open surgery for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) versus open surgery for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006642.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominic Pang, Diane Hildebrand, Paul Bachoo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 34%
Other 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 74%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Unspecified 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Unknown 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,794,588
of 12,623,030 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,911
of 10,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,391
of 205,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,623,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.