↓ Skip to main content

Birmingham and Lambeth Liver Evaluation Testing Strategies (BALLETS): a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Birmingham and Lambeth Liver Evaluation Testing Strategies (BALLETS): a prospective cohort study
Published in
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., July 2013
DOI 10.3310/hta17280
Pubmed ID
Authors

RJ Lilford, L Bentham, A Girling, I Litchfield, R Lancashire, D Armstrong, R Jones, T Marteau, J Neuberger, P Gill, R Cramb, S Olliff, D Arnold, K Khan, MJ Armstrong, DD Houlihan, PN Newsome, PJ Chilton, K Moons, D Altman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 7%
Other 2 4%
Librarian 2 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 43 77%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Unknown 43 77%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,646,182
of 13,851,278 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#712
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,708
of 340,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#24
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,851,278 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.