You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Birmingham and Lambeth Liver Evaluation Testing Strategies (BALLETS): a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3310/hta17280 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R J Lilford, L Bentham, A Girling, I Litchfield, R Lancashire, D Armstrong, R Jones, T Marteau, J Neuberger, P Gill, R Cramb, S Olliff, D Arnold, K Khan, M J Armstrong, D D Houlihan, P N Newsome, P J Chilton, K Moons, D Altman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Lebanon | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,115,524
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#1,080
of 1,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,444
of 206,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.