↓ Skip to main content

I Tweet, Therefore I Learn

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 6,460)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
162 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
I Tweet, Therefore I Learn
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, February 2020
DOI 10.1213/ane.0000000000004036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric S. Schwenk, Kellie M. Jaremko, Brian H. Park, Marjorie A. Stiegler, Jamison G. Gamble, Larry F. Chu, Audun Utengen, Edward R. Mariano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 162 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Computer Science 1 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#232,393
of 16,064,402 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#46
of 6,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,748
of 339,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#2
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,064,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.