↓ Skip to main content

I Tweet, Therefore I Learn

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 5,733)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
142 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
I Tweet, Therefore I Learn
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, January 2019
DOI 10.1213/ane.0000000000004036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric S. Schwenk, Kellie M. Jaremko, Brian H. Park, Marjorie A. Stiegler, Jamison G. Gamble, Larry F. Chu, Audun Utengen, Edward R. Mariano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#188,982
of 13,529,863 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#35
of 5,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,344
of 293,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#2
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,529,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.