↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic Pathology in 2011: reflecting on the development of an open access journal during the last six years.

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic Pathology in 2011: reflecting on the development of an open access journal during the last six years.
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-6-129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayser K

Abstract

Today, electronic communication is involved in all parts of our lives, either in a directed active, communicative, or passive manner. Whether to live with electronic communication or to ignore it is no longer a question. Instead, the question we have to answer is: How shall we live in our communicative environment? What can we expect? What are we forced to develop in order "to survive"? This Editorial written at the end of a really successful year of our journal Diagnostic Pathology tries to give some answers from different points of view:

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Computer Science 1 33%
Psychology 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2012.
All research outputs
#1,993,832
of 4,505,992 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#159
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,412
of 234,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 53rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.