↓ Skip to main content

Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisbeth M. Johansson, Hans Lingfors, Marie Golsäter, Margareta Kristenson, Eleonor I. Fransson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Lecturer 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 28 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Sports and Recreations 8 11%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 30 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,194,511
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#352
of 2,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,522
of 453,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#17
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.