↓ Skip to main content

Hominoid anterior teeth from the late Oligocene site of Losodok, Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Evolution, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hominoid anterior teeth from the late Oligocene site of Losodok, Kenya
Published in
Journal of Human Evolution, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.12.010
Authors

Ashley S. Hammond, Kimberly K. Foecke, Jay Kelley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#903,603
of 12,533,317 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Evolution
#363
of 1,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,470
of 158,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Evolution
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,533,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.