You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inbreeding Avoidance Influences the Viability of Reintroduced Populations of African Wild Dogs (Lycaon pictus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0037181 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Penny A. Becker, Philip S. Miller, Micaela Szykman Gunther, Michael J. Somers, David E. Wildt, Jesús E. Maldonado |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 196 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 22% |
| Researcher | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 114 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,053,042
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#72,613
of 194,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,770
of 164,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,116
of 3,851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.