You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whitening toothpaste containing activated charcoal, blue covarine, hydrogen peroxide or microbeads: which one is the most effective?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa Torraca Peraro Vaz, Dandara Proba Jubilato, Morgana Regina Mendonça de Oliveira, Janaina Freitas Bortolatto, Michael Christopher Floros, Andrea Abi Rached Dantas, Osmir Batista de Oliveira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 270 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Researcher | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 119 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 124 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#338,852
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#3
of 605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,386
of 449,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.