You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inappropriateness of health care in Canada: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-0948-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janet E. Squires, Ian D. Graham, Doris Grinspun, John Lavis, France Légaré, Robert Bell, Stephen Bornstein, Susan E. Brien, Mark Dobrow, Megan Greenough, Carole A. Estabrooks, Michael Hillmer, Tanya Horsley, Alan Katz, Christina Krause, Wendy Levinson, Adrian Levy, Michelina Mancuso, Alies Maybee, Steve Morgan, Letitia Nadalin Penno, Andrew Neuner, Tamara Rader, Janet Roberts, Gary Teare, Joshua Tepper, Amanda Vandyk, Denise Widmeyer, Michael Wilson, Jeremy M. Grimshaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 48% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
| Scientists | 9 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Librarian | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 30 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,895,125
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#515
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,194
of 458,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#27
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.