You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human cerebrospinal fluid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-10-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan M Street, Perdita E Barran, C Logan Mackay, Stefan Weidt, Craig Balmforth, Tim S Walsh, Rod TA Chalmers, David J Webb, James W Dear |
| Abstract |
Exosomes are released from multiple cell types, contain protein and RNA species, and have been exploited as a novel reservoir for disease biomarker discovery. They can transfer information between cells and may cause pathology, for example, a role for exosomes has been proposed in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease. Although studied in several biofluids, exosomes have not been extensively studied in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from humans. The objective of this study was to determine: 1) whether human CSF contains exosomes and 2) the variability in exosomal protein content across individuals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 420 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 84 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 85 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 37 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 11% |
| Unknown | 107 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,516,521
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#442
of 4,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,068
of 250,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.