You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The estimation of crop emergence in potatoes by UAV RGB imagery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0399-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bo Li, Xiangming Xu, Jiwan Han, Li Zhang, Chunsong Bian, Liping Jin, Jiangang Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 36% |
| Engineering | 15 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 72 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,438,902
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#722
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,699
of 447,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.