You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Revisiting the Rayleigh–Plateau instability for the nanoscale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Fluid Mechanics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1017/jfm.2018.950 |
| Authors |
Chengxi Zhao, James E. Sprittles, Duncan A. Lockerby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 28% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 23% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 17% |
| Energy | 4 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#600,018
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fluid Mechanics
#38
of 5,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,222
of 437,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fluid Mechanics
#2
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,296 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.