↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting the Rayleigh–Plateau instability for the nanoscale

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fluid Mechanics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 3,064)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Revisiting the Rayleigh–Plateau instability for the nanoscale
Published in
Journal of Fluid Mechanics, January 2019
DOI 10.1017/jfm.2018.950
Authors

Chengxi Zhao, James E. Sprittles, Duncan A. Lockerby

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 26%
Physics and Astronomy 8 24%
Energy 3 9%
Materials Science 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#315,436
of 14,414,290 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fluid Mechanics
#21
of 3,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,044
of 329,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fluid Mechanics
#2
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,414,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,064 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.