↓ Skip to main content

Emotional Stroop task: effect of word arousal and subject anxiety on emotional interference

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
456 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emotional Stroop task: effect of word arousal and subject anxiety on emotional interference
Published in
Psychological Research, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00426-008-0154-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Dresler, Katja Mériau, Hauke R. Heekeren, Elke van der Meer

Abstract

Inconsistent findings regarding the emotional Stroop effect in healthy subjects may be explained by confounding effects of stimulus valence and arousal, as well as individual differences in anxiety. We examined reaction time data in a healthy sample using the emotional Stroop task while carefully matching arousal level of positive and negative words. Independent of valence, emotional relative to neutral words elicited emotional interference, indicating that arousal determines emotional interference. Independent of valence, emotional words were better re-called and recognized than neutral words. Individual differences in state anxiety were associated with emotional interference, that is, emotional interference was enhanced in subjects with high state anxiety. There was no influence of trait anxiety. These findings indicate that word arousal produces emotional interference independent of valence. State anxiety exacerbates interference of emotional words by further biasing attention towards emotionally salient stimuli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 445 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 154 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 14%
Researcher 47 10%
Student > Master 45 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 4%
Other 58 13%
Unknown 69 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 290 64%
Neuroscience 16 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 43 9%
Unknown 79 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,503,490
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#97
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,009
of 82,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them