↓ Skip to main content

Principal-Oscillation-Pattern Analysis of Gene Expression

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Principal-Oscillation-Pattern Analysis of Gene Expression
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028805
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daifeng Wang, Ari Arapostathis, Claus O. Wilke, Mia K. Markey

Abstract

Principal-oscillation-pattern (POP) analysis is a multivariate and systematic technique for identifying the dynamic characteristics of a system from time-series data. In this study, we demonstrate the first application of POP analysis to genome-wide time-series gene-expression data. We use POP analysis to infer oscillation patterns in gene expression. Typically, a genomic system matrix cannot be directly estimated because the number of genes is usually much larger than the number of time points in a genomic study. Thus, we first identify the POPs of the eigen-genomic system that consists of the first few significant eigengenes obtained by singular value decomposition. By using the linear relationship between eigengenes and genes, we then infer the POPs of the genes. Both simulation data and real-world data are used in this study to demonstrate the applicability of POP analysis to genomic data. We show that POP analysis not only compares favorably with experiments and existing computational methods, but that it also provides complementary information relative to other approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
France 1 3%
Hungary 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Ireland 1 3%
Unknown 32 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Engineering 4 11%
Mathematics 3 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#23,087,103
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#203,120
of 224,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,900
of 250,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,928
of 3,210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.