You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SiPMs coated with TPB: coating protocol and characterization for NEXT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Instrumentation, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-0221/7/02/p02010 |
| Authors |
V Álvarez, J Agramunt, M Ball, M Batallé, J Bayarri, F I G Borges, H Bolink, H Brine, S Cárcel, J M Carmona, J Castel, J M Catalá, S Cebrián, A Cervera, D Chan, C A N Conde, T Dafni, T H V T Dias, J Díaz, R Esteve, P Evtoukhovitch, J Ferrando, L M P Fernandes, P Ferrario, A L Ferreira, E Ferrer-Ribas, E D C Freitas, S A García, A Gil, I Giomataris, A Goldschmidt, E Gómez, H Gómez, J J Gómez-Cadenas, K González, R M Gutiérrez, J Hauptman, J A Hernando-Morata, D C Herrera, V Herrero, F J Iguaz, I G Irastorza, V Kalinnikov, L Labarga, I Liubarsky, J A M Lopes, D Lorca, M Losada, G Luzón, A Marí, J Martin-Albo, A M Méndez, T Miller, A Moisenko, F Monrabal, C M B Monteiro, J M Monzó, F J Mora, J Muñoz Vidal, H Natal da Luz, G Navarro, M Nebot, D Nygren, C A B Oliveira, R Palma, J L Pérez Aparicio, J Pérez, E Radicioni, M Quinto, J Renner, L Ripoll, A Rodriguez, J Rodriguez, F P Santos, J M F dos Santos, L Seguí, L Serra, D Shuman, C Sofka, M Sorel, A Soriano, H Spieler, J F Toledo, J Torrent Collell, A Tomás, Z Tsamalaidze, D Vázquez, E Velicheva, J F C A Veloso, J A Villar, R Webb, T Weber, J T White, N Yahlali |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 17 | 30% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2012.
All research outputs
#20,153,989
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Instrumentation
#1,128
of 1,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,816
of 156,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Instrumentation
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.