You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
La ética de los diseños y métodos alternativos de ensayos clínicos. Una reflexión sobre el Foro Global de Bioética en Investigación del 2017
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.26633/rpsp.2018.38 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carla Saenz, Florencia Luna, Sofía P Salas, Julio Arturo Canario, Jackeline Bravo Chamorro, Ricardo Palacios, Estela Quiroz, Patricia Saidón, Bertha María Villela |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#496
of 1,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,135
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#38
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.