↓ Skip to main content

Reconsidering the pseudo-family/gang gender distinction in prison research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconsidering the pseudo-family/gang gender distinction in prison research
Published in
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, March 2003
DOI 10.1007/bf02802604
Authors

Craig J. Forsyth, Rhonda D. Evans

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 27%
Social Sciences 3 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Philosophy 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
#171
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,837
of 50,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them