You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Shape Variation in Aterian Tanged Tools and the Origins of Projectile Technology: A Morphometric Perspective on Stone Tool Function
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0029029 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Radu Iovita |
Abstract |
Recent findings suggest that the North African Middle Stone Age technocomplex known as the Aterian is both much older than previously assumed, and certainly associated with fossils exhibiting anatomically modern human morphology and behavior. The Aterian is defined by the presence of 'tanged' or 'stemmed' tools, which have been widely assumed to be among the earliest projectile weapon tips. The present study systematically investigates morphological variation in a large sample of Aterian tools to test the hypothesis that these tools were hafted and/or used as projectile weapons. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
Researcher | 18 | 18% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 20% |
Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 39 | 40% |
Social Sciences | 20 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,983,285
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,503
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,431
of 243,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#283
of 2,948 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,948 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.