↓ Skip to main content

Morphometrics Parallel Genetics in a Newly Discovered and Endangered Taxon of Galápagos Tortoise

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morphometrics Parallel Genetics in a Newly Discovered and Endangered Taxon of Galápagos Tortoise
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006272
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ylenia Chiari, Chaz Hyseni, Tom H. Fritts, Scott Glaberman, Cruz Marquez, James P. Gibbs, Julien Claude, Adalgisa Caccone

Abstract

Galápagos tortoises represent the only surviving lineage of giant tortoises that exhibit two different types of shell morphology. The taxonomy of Galápagos tortoises was initially based mainly on diagnostic morphological characters of the shell, but has been clarified by molecular studies indicating that most islands harbor monophyletic lineages, with the exception of Isabela and Santa Cruz. On Santa Cruz there is strong genetic differentiation between the two tortoise populations (Cerro Fatal and La Reserva) exhibiting domed shell morphology. Here we integrate nuclear microsatellite and mitochondrial data with statistical analyses of shell shape morphology to evaluate whether the genetic distinction and variability of the two domed tortoise populations is paralleled by differences in shell shape. Based on our results, morphometric analyses support the genetic distinction of the two populations and also reveal that the level of genetic variation is associated with morphological shell shape variation in both populations. The Cerro Fatal population possesses lower levels of morphological and genetic variation compared to the La Reserva population. Because the turtle shell is a complex heritable trait, our results suggest that, for the Cerro Fatal population, non-neutral loci have probably experienced a parallel decrease in variability as that observed for the genetic data.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 103 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 50%
Environmental Science 18 15%
Computer Science 7 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 14 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,889,378
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#48,193
of 201,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,136
of 96,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#139
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.