You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Epidemiology of HIV Infection in Large Urban Areas in the United States
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012756 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
H. Irene Hall, Lorena Espinoza, Nanette Benbow, Yunyin W. Hu |
Abstract |
While the U.S. HIV epidemic continues to be primarily concentrated in urban area, local epidemiologic profiles may differ and require different approaches in prevention and treatment efforts. We describe the epidemiology of HIV in large urban areas with the highest HIV burden. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Mexico | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Thailand | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 24% |
Professor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 28% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 21% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,782,536
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,818
of 221,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,246
of 105,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#104
of 939 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 939 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.