↓ Skip to main content

Metagenomic Analysis of the Bioremediation of Diesel-Contaminated Canadian High Arctic Soils

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metagenomic Analysis of the Bioremediation of Diesel-Contaminated Canadian High Arctic Soils
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Etienne Yergeau, Sylvie Sanschagrin, Danielle Beaumier, Charles W. Greer

Abstract

As human activity in the Arctic increases, so does the risk of hydrocarbon pollution events. On site bioremediation of contaminated soil is the only feasible clean up solution in these remote areas, but degradation rates vary widely between bioremediation treatments. Most previous studies have focused on the feasibility of on site clean-up and very little attention has been given to the microbial and functional communities involved and their ecology. Here, we ask the question: which microorganisms and functional genes are abundant and active during hydrocarbon degradation at cold temperature? To answer this question, we sequenced the soil metagenome of an ongoing bioremediation project in Alert, Canada through a time course. We also used reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) to quantify the expression of several hydrocarbon-degrading genes. Pseudomonas species appeared as the most abundant organisms in Alert soils right after contamination with diesel and excavation (t = 0) and one month after the start of the bioremediation treatment (t = 1m), when degradation rates were at their highest, but decreased after one year (t = 1y), when residual soil hydrocarbons were almost depleted. This trend was also reflected in hydrocarbon degrading genes, which were mainly affiliated with Gammaproteobacteria at t = 0 and t = 1m and with Alphaproteobacteria and Actinobacteria at t = 1y. RT-qPCR assays confirmed that Pseudomonas and Rhodococcus species actively expressed hydrocarbon degradation genes in Arctic biopile soils. Taken together, these results indicated that biopile treatment leads to major shifts in soil microbial communities, favoring aerobic bacteria that can degrade hydrocarbons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 366 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 24%
Researcher 56 14%
Student > Master 54 14%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 59 15%
Unknown 58 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 39%
Environmental Science 61 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 4%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 80 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,749,220
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,358
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,599
of 243,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#993
of 3,220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.