You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RFID Tracking of Sublethal Effects of Two Neonicotinoid Insecticides on the Foraging Behavior of Apis mellifera
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0030023 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christof W. Schneider, Jürgen Tautz, Bernd Grünewald, Stefan Fuchs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 531 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 504 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 14% |
| Researcher | 75 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 101 | 19% |
| Unknown | 85 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 275 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 47 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 3% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 11% |
| Unknown | 97 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,040,834
of 25,157,832 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,448
of 218,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,404
of 255,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#136
of 3,217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,157,832 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.